Relationship between political science and history.
Discuss the relationship between political science and history.
How do political science and history depend on each other?
Similarities and differences between political science and history.
The relationship between political science and history: -
Political science and history are two very important branches of the social sciences. Both discuss the social and political life of the people. In other words, both are interdependent. John Seeley commented on the relationship between political science and history - History without political science has no fruit; Political science without history has no root.
From this comment , it is clear that the relationship between political science and history is very deep.
'' History is past politics, politics is present history. '' - Freeman
'' Political science stands midway between History and politics, between past and present. It has drawn material from the one, it has to apply them to the other. '' - Lord Bryce.
Similarities and interdependencies of political science and history: -
1. Both political science and history discuss different aspects of human social life. People's political life is discussed in both subjects.
2. The present is a variant of the past. All the elements and features of the modern state are hidden in the past. Political science analyzes the political system of the present society by taking the concept of past society from history.
3. By collecting information from history, political science can establish general formulas through analytical discussions about the shortcomings of the present society. The solution to current political problems is largely possible through these simple formulas.
4. The discussion of political science is not complete without the concept of history; Again, history is incomplete without political discussion. Both are deeply interdependent.
5. In order to complete the discussion of the state, it is necessary to connect the issues of the origin, history, evolution, growing political events of the state - etc. Political science derives all this knowledge from history. Thus, with the help of history, political science completes its discussion.
6. Again history also depends on political science. History discusses the analysis of political events with the help of political science, the search for causes, the judgment of results, and so on. Thus history, with the help of political science, makes its discussion of the state rational and political.
7. Political science deals theoretically with various elements of state life, such as independence, nationalism, internationalism, socialism, etc., and in this case the discussion of history is largely factual. Through political science we can gain a basic idea about things and form ideas about how things have been used in practice through history.
8. The history of any country cannot be complete without the political life and political activities of the people. History is enriched by gaining ideas about political life, various political institutions, political theories, etc. from political science.
Differences in Political Science and History: -
1. Broadness of content: - The content of history is much more comprehensive than political science. Political science only deals with the political life of the people. But history deals with people's political life as well as society, economy, culture and various other aspects.
2. Differences in values: - Political science discusses the state and the political system. Therefore, in such discussions, personal bias of political scientists may be applied. But history is above the discussion of values. History analyzes events only on the basis of the information obtained, does not try to influence events.
3. Fictional theoretical differences: - Political science has resorted to fiction in many discussions. There are many mythical theories about the origin of the state, the origin and development of national life. But history never takes refuge in imagination. Provides details of incidents based on information obtained only.
4. Systematic differences: - History gives descriptive details of its subjects. But political science only deals with certain theories and facts. History consistently provides an explanation of social life; But political science only focuses on the political life of the people.
5. Differences in continuity: - The discussion of history is continuous; That is, history gives the details of a series of events over time. But political science deals only with events and issues related to the political life of the people instead of a series of descriptions.
6. Differences in interdependence: - Political science does not collect information only from history; Apart from history, it also collects information from anthropology, philosophy, etc. But history is largely dependent on archeological material, literature, etc.
7. Differences in the discussion of political life: - When discussing the political life of the people, history emphasizes on different events. But political science builds theories around various historical events.
8. Objective and Idealistic Science: - History is basically an objective or objective social science. History never discusses justification - it only explains events. But political science is an ideological science. Political science, along with giving an explanation of state life, also highlights the right, wrong and principled aspects.
In conclusion, although there are some differences between political science and history, the close relationship that exists between the two scriptures cannot be denied; Both subjects complement and help each other. In fact, every branch of social science is interdependent and no branch can be separated from the other.
0 comments