Pages

Powered by Blogger.

Pages

Pages

Pages

facebook twitter instagram pinterest bloglovin Email
Career CLASS 11 (XI) Class XI 1st Semester CLASS XI 2nd Semester H.S. 3rd SEM H.S. EDUCATION H.S. HISTORY HS SOCIOLOGY HS SUGGESTION INDIAN HISTORY NCERT POLITY PROJECT Sociological Studies Teaching & Education TEST PAPERS SOLVE TEST PAPERS SOLVE 2020 WORLD HISTORY XI EDUCATION XI HISTORY XI POL SC XI SOCIOLOGY XII Bengali XII Sanskrit

Pages

Nandan Dutta

School project and education news.

Pages

Differences / Comparative Discussion between Presidential Government and Cabinet Government.

Differences / Comparative Discussion between Presidential Government and Parliamentary System.

Distinction / Difference between Parliamentary and Presidential forms of Government.




The difference between a presidential government and a cabinet government.

The difference between a presidential government and a parliamentary system of government.


Governments established on the basis of the principle of separation of powers, can be divided into two classes; Namely - President-led government and Cabinet-led or parliamentary government. In these two systems of government, the government is elected by the people for a fixed period of time. However, there are many differences between the two types of government. The differences are as follows: -

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


1. Differences in the construction of the legislature: - In the case of a government ruled by the President, the head of state is not appointed by the legislature. He is directly appointed by the people. Therefore, in a government led by the President, the head of state cannot control the legislature in any way or the legislature cannot control the president.
But in a parliamentary system of government, the head of state is constitutional and he is considered an integral part of the legislature. He may convene or adjourn the session of Parliament. No bill can become law even without the consent of the President.

2. Differences in the nature of the head of state: - In a system of government run by the President, all the powers of the state are vested in the President. He is the real ruler of the country.
On the other hand, the head of state in a cabinet-run government is constitutional. That is, theoretically he is the head of state but not the head of government. That is, he manages the state by his subordinate ministers. In this case, the prime minister is the real head of state.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

3. Differences in responsibilities to the legislature: - In a system of government run by the President, the President is directly appointed by the people. So he is not responsible to the legislature for his work in any way.
But in a cabinet-led government, the cabinet is appointed by the legislature. As a result, they are jointly responsible to the people and the legislature.

4. Differences in the removal of the President: - In a government ruled by the President, the legislature cannot remove the President by bringing a motion of no confidence against him. Only on the grounds of incompetence, treason, etc. can the President be removed.
But in a parliamentary system of government, the cabinet always has to maintain a majority in the legislature. If the cabinet loses its majority, the legislature can dissolve the cabinet before its term expires.

5. Differences in the relationship between the legislature and the executive: - There is no relationship between the legislature and the president as the principle of separation of powers is recognized in the system of government run by the president. Here the legislature cannot control the president in any way and the president cannot participate in the session of the legislature or in the question and answer session.
But in a parliamentary system of government there is a direct relationship between the government and the legislature. The legislature can control directly here. The members of the cabinet are elected from among the elected members of the majority party in the legislature.

6. Differences in the powers of the Cabinet: - In a system of government run by the President, the Ministers are elected directly by the President. The duration of the tenure of the ministers depends on the will or reluctance of the President. Here the ministers are only loyal employees of the President.
But in a cabinet-run system of government, the majority party leaders are appointed prime minister and other ministers. In such a system of government, the prime minister has the upper hand, but the other ministers have the power to formulate independent powers and policies.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

7. Differences in the composition of the cabinet: - In a system of government governed by the President, the ministers are directly appointed by the President. The President forms the cabinet with his subordinates or others on the basis of his own will or reluctance.
But in a cabinet-run system of governance, the president appoints members of the cabinet, but he does so on the advice of the prime minister. In other words, the President does not have any direct power in forming the cabinet.

8. Differences in Sustainability: - The Presidential government is more stable than the cabinet system. In a presidential government, the president or other ministers cannot be removed without specific allegations.
But a no-confidence motion could bring down the government before the end of the term in the cabinet-run system.

9. Differences in the separation of powers: - The principle of separation of powers is followed in the system of government run by the President. Here the executive, the legislature and the judiciary operate independently of each other on the basis of the principle of separation of powers.
But the principle of separation of powers is not followed in the system of governance run by the cabinet. As a result, there is a close relationship between the legislature and executive departments and they influence each other in the conduct of their business.

10. Question of supremacy of the judiciary: - In the system of government ruled by the President, the judiciary is completely out of control from legislature or executive and the supremacy of the judiciary is given priority in the state.
But in the cabinet-run governance, the legislature is given precedence over the judiciary, and the legislature and executive can control the judiciary.

11. Differences in case of emergency: - The system of government run by the President is more effective in case of emergency than the parliamentary system. Here the president himself can make the necessary decisions for emergencies.
But in a cabinet-run system of governance, decisions have to be made through a variety of negotiations. Therefore, the system of governance run by the cabinet is not more effective in case of emergency.

12. Differences in the majority in the legislature: - In a system of government run by the President, the President is directly appointed by the people. Here the majority in the legislature has nothing to do with the election of the President.
But in a cabinet-run system of government, the government is formed on the basis of majority in the legislature. No government can be formed in the parliamentary system by any means other than a single majority. 

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments

What is the parliamentary system? Write the features of the parliamentary system of government.


Definition and features of parliamentary system.




Concept and Definition of Parliamentary system: -


The three main branches of government are legislative, executive and judiciary. In parliamentary governance, there is a relationship of interdependence between the legislature and the executive. The members of the executive are elected from the legislature and they are accountable to the legislature. The stability of the executive also depends on the legislature.

In this type of governance, power is divided by the constitution between the center and the states. In this system of  government, all powers of the central government are vested in a constitutional head, but the actual powers of the government are exercised by the Prime Minister and the Cabinet headed by the Prime Minister. That is why the parliamentary system of government is also called the system of government run by the cabinet.

Parliamentary or cabinet systems can be observed in India, Great Britain, Japan, Sweden, New Zealand, Australia, etc.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

Features / Characteristics of Parliamentary System: -


The features of the parliamentary system are -

1. Constitutional Head of State: - In all the countries where parliamentary system of government is prevalent, all powers are theoretically vested in the hands of the constitutional head of state. All the functions and policies of the central government are conducted in his name. In fact, the prime minister and his cabinet enjoy real power. Although the government is run in the name of the head of state, he has no power to run the government and he plays the role of constitutional head of state.

2. Actual Head of Government: Prime Minister: - The Prime Minister is the one who exercises all the powers of running the government in the parliamentary system of government. The formation of the Cabinet, the distribution of portfolios, the formulation and implementation of policies, the conduct of foreign relations, the conduct of monetary policy - all these functions are conducted under the leadership of the Prime Minister. Thus, the real head of the parliamentary system of government is the Prime Minister.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

3. It is not possible to fully implement the principle of separation of powers: - According to the principle of separation of powers, the three branches of government - legislature, executive and judiciary will be completely independent of each other. But it is not possible to fully implement the principle of separation of powers in the parliamentary system of government. In this system each department can control each other. For example, members of the executive are elected from the legislature. 

4. Close Relationship between legislature and executive  - In the parliamentary system of government, the executive is formed from within the legislature and the executive is jointly responsible to the Legislative Assembly. On the one hand the stability of the executive depends on the legislature and on the other hand the executive controls the functions of the legislature to a large extent.

5. Role of the lower house: - The lower house has a major role in the formation of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet in the parliamentary system of government. Although the lower house is constituted for a fixed period, the lower house can be dissolved before the expiry of its term. In India, for example, the President may dissolve the lower house on the advice of the Prime Minister.

6. Dual responsibilities of the cabinet: - Ministers play a dual role in the parliamentary system of government. On the one hand a cabinet minister has to run his office as a minister and on the other hand he has to serve as a member of the legislature.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

7. Election of Legislative Assembly: - In the parliamentary system of government, the legislature is elected for a fixed term. For example, the term of office of the Lok Sabha in India is five years, and the House of Commons of Great Britain is elected for five years.

8. Confidence towards the legislature of the Cabinet: - In the system of parliamentary governance, the cabinet has to have confidence in the legislature. If for any reason a minister of a party fails to gain certain confidence, he has to resign. If the Prime Minister could not prove his confidence in the motion of no-confidence brought against the Prime Minister, the entire cabinet would collapse in principle.

9. Effectiveness of the Opposition: - The presence of a strong and effective opposition party can be noticed in the parliamentary system of government. Opposition parties have to play a role in sharply criticizing the anti-people policies of the government, blocking the implementation of anti-people policies of the government through appropriate measures, presenting the demands of the people to the government, and forcing the government to complete the announced programs.

10. Relationship with democracy: - Democracy is considered to be safe in parliamentary system of government. Since power is not concentrated in one hand in this type of system, the risk of the ruler becoming dictatorial is very low. Although the Prime Minister is the supreme in government, he too can be removed by the legislature.

11. Causal relationship with capitalism: - Rajanipam Dutta has criticized the parliamentary system of government for establishing causal relationship with capitalism. According to him, even if the principles of democracy are upheld in the parliamentary system of governance, a system is created in the workplace which establishes the supremacy of capitalism.

12. Multi-party system: - Generally, the presence of multiple parties can be noticed in the parliamentary system of government. In India, for example, the existence of a large number of political parties at the national and regional levels is noticeable. Due to the existence of a multi-party system, there is a tendency to form alliances in many cases during the formation of government. There are many examples of such incidents in Indian parliamentary politics.

In conclusion, the characteristics are variable in terms of country and time. For example, in India and Britain, the parliamentary system of government is prevalent, but the system of government in both countries is not exactly the same. With the change of era, the power of the cabinet and the cabinet has been increasing and the executive and legislature is gradually coming under the complete control of the cabinet.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments

Comparative study of Unitary and Federal political systems .

Distinction or difference between Unitary and Federal Government. 




In a unitary system of governance, the central government is in control. Although there is a government for the states, they are run under the central government. Great Britain, France, New Zealand - etc. the existence of a monolithic government can be noticed. On the other hand, in the case of the federal government, decentralization of power occurs. In this type of governance, power is divided between the central and state governments by the constitution. Although the central government has more power, the state governments are not subordinate to the central government and they can govern independently according to the powers given by the constitution. The differences between the unitary and federal governments are as follows: -

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

1. Differences in the nature of government: - All the powers of the unitary government are vested in a single central government. Although they form regional governments for administrative convenience, the regional governments operate under the central government and the existence of the regional governments depends on the will or reluctance of the central government. 
But in the case of the federal government, power is decentralized, and regional governments can govern independently on the basis of constitutional powers. In this case, the existence of regional governments does not depend on the central government.

2. Differences in the nature of constitution: - The constitution of a unitary state can be both written and unwritten. For example, the constitution of Great Britain is written but the constitution of France is unwritten. Since there is no distribution of power in the unitary system, there is no problem even if the constitution is unwritten. 
But in the federal system of government, the constitution must be written. Because if the constitution is not written, the distribution of power within the federal structure will not be possible. That is why the constitutions of India, USA and so on are written.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

3. Differences in the variability of the constitution: - The constitution is easily changeable in the unitary states. The central government can change the constitution at its own convenience. 
But in the federal system of government, the constitution is hard to change. Changes to the constitution also require the consent of state or regional governments. The main purpose of such an arrangement is to safeguard regional interests.

4. Differences in the importance of the constitution: - The constitution is unimportant in a unitary  system. The government can easily change the constitution as it pleases. As a result, the unitary constitution is disrespectful. 
But in the federal system, the constitution has the highest status. All individuals, institutions, central and state governments - all have to abide by the provisions of the Constitution. The source of all power in the federal system is the constitution.

5. Differences in the importance of the courts: - In a unitary system of government, since the central government wields all the powers, the importance of unitary court is comparatively less. 
But in the federal system, the courts wield much more power. The federal court serves as the chief interpreter of the constitution. Laws that are inconsistent with the constitution may be declared invalid. Can resolve all types of disputes and acts as a defender of the fundamental rights of citizens.

6. Differences in citizenship: - In a unitary system, one-citizenship is generally recognized and in the federal system, dual-citizenship is recognized. In the United States, for example, dual citizenship is recognized. But exceptions can be noticed. For example, even though India is a federal nation, single citizenship is recognized here.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

7. Differences in the existential aspects of the constitution of a state: - There is usually only one constitution in a unitary system of government. There is no separate constitution for the states. But in the federal system , there are many separate constitutions for their states. However, separate constitutions for the states have to be drafted in accordance with the central constitution.

8. Differences regarding regional interests: - Regional interests are likely to be neglected in a unitary system of governance. All power is vested in the central government . It can harm regional interests. 
But under federal governance, regional governments can also independently determine the way they operate and policy. As a result, regional interests are guaranteed in the federal system.

In conclusion, the history, political status, customs, traditions, public opinion, culture, etc. of a country depends on the type of governance that will be introduced in that country.
However, in the current political system of the world, the federal system is prevalent in large countries. Such as - India and the United States. Again, despite China being a large country, no federal measures have been taken there.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments

Advantages and disadvantages of a parliamentary or cabinet-run system of governance.

Merit and Demerits of a parliamentary or cabinet-run government.

Merit and Demerits of parliamentary system.




Advantages of Parliamentary or Cabinet-led Government: -


1. Joint Cooperation and Direct Relationship of legislature and executive department: - A notable feature of the parliamentary government is the direct relationship between the executive  department and the legislature. Thus a direct relationship between the executive and the legislature reduces the likelihood of conflict between the two departments and the possibility of a constitutional stalemate. An environment of joint cooperation is created between the two departments in formulating and implementing policies.

2. Flexible and resilient: - Government system is flexible and resilient in the parliamentary system of government. It is possible to make appropriate changes in government policy on the basis of any kind of complex or urgent situation. It is possible to make necessary changes in the administration or government based on the national and international situation. So the parliamentary government is flexible and resilient.

LIST OF ALL NOTES / PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


3. Cabinet responsible to the legislature: - In the parliamentary system of government, the cabinet is responsible to the legislature. The legislature can remove an incompetent or corrupt cabinet with the help of its constitutional powers. If necessary, the legislature can be dissolved and re-elected. As a result, the executive can be run in line with the needs of the people.

4. Preventing the Autocratic Tendency of the executive: - In a parliamentary system of government, the executive is directly accountable to the legislature. Even the tenure of the executive depends on the legislature. The legislature can remove the administration if necessary. Therefore, in the parliamentary system of governance, the autocratic tendency of the department of executive decreases.

5. Dissemination of Political Awareness: - In the Parliamentary system of government, functions of Legislative Assembly and executive department , various policies and plans, conduct of Legislative Assembly, discussion of various proposals in Legislative Assembly, etc. are published in different media, thus spreading political awareness among the people.

6. Mutual Relationship between the Government and the Opposition: - Mutual relations between the Government and the Opposition in the parliamentary system of governance help in formulating policies for the welfare of the people. Governments formulate policies; In the same way, the opposition party forces the government to formulate policies for the welfare of the people by opposing government activities.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


7. Recognition of the status of the Opposition: - In the system of parliamentary governance, the constitutional status of both the ruling party and the opposition is recognized. Leader of the Opposition is a constitutional term. Opposition parties also enjoy unfettered freedom to criticize government policies and actions. As a result of such constitutional status of the opposition, the democratic situation in the constitutional field is favorable.

8. Supportive for a corruption free administrative system: - Parliamentary system of governance is conducive to running a corruption free administration. Any anti-people policy, activity, etc. of the government is an opportunity for the opposition and by using this opportunity the opposition creates an anti-government atmosphere through massive propaganda and even calls on the government. As a result, the government always has to maintain a transparent image.

Disadvantages of parliamentary or cabinet-run governance system: -


1. Instability: - In a parliamentary system of government, if the government or the executive loses the confidence of the legislature for any reason or withdraws the support of the majority members, the government collapses. The government has always had to depend on the legislature for stability. As a result, the government has to rely on the consent of the legislature to implement any of its policies and plans.

2. Inadequacy in case of coalition government: - Coalition government is often formed in the parliamentary system of government. But this alliance between multiple political parties is formed on the basis of mutual understanding. But when a conflict arises between the coalition parties and one party withdraws its support, the government easily collapses.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


3. Government is not above corruption: - It is not the case that a cabinet-led government can always run a corruption-free system of governance. In many cases, personal and party interests are given priority over national interests. When a party forms a government with a huge majority, it also establishes a monopoly in the legislature. As a result, attempts are made to destroy any anti-government allegations at the outset.

4. Absence of power separation policy: - Parliamentary system of government lacks power separation policy. When a party forms a government with a large majority, the legislature is easily established. As a result, individual freedom is at stake.

5. Possibility of Confusion of Public Opinion: - Ministers often do not present discussions in the Legislative Assembly with proper information. The statements they make, which focus on party interests, personal interests, etc., confuse the public opinion. The government even tries to dominate the media for its own benefit.

6. Dominance of the Legislature: - In a parliamentary system of government, when a party forms a government with an overwhelming majority, each member of that party submits to party loyalty and is silently supported in all policies and plans of the executive. In this way the ruling party also spreads their dominance in the legislature.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


7. The constitutional head is not the real head: - The constitutional head of the state is not the real head in the parliamentary system of government. The real ruler in this system of government is the Prime Minister. But if there is a conflict of power and authority between the constitutional and the real ruler, it creates an unfavorable situation in the governance.

8. Bureaucratic Impact: - Ministers often do not have the skills and experience required to run a parliamentary system of government. As a result, the executive has to depend on bureaucracy. This bureaucracy has a detrimental effect on the parliamentary system of government.

9. Not suitable for emergencies: - Parliamentary system of government is not suitable for emergencies and crises. Because in this type of governance, it is possible to reach a conclusion through various processes like discussion, debate, etc. This results in delays in decision making and implementation.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments

Advantages and disadvantages of a presidential government.

Merit and Demerits of Presidential government.



 

Advantages or Merits of Presidential Government: -


1. The most significant advantage of a presidential government is the stability of the President's tenure. The term of office of the President does not depend on the will or consent of the legislature. Therefore, the President can run the government according to his own rights, considerations and programs. The legislature cannot directly control the president here. In a presidential system of government, the president is elected for a fixed term. Although he can be removed. However, since the removal procedure is very complicated, he cannot be removed before the term without any special charges.

2. Instead of being enslaved by the party or the legislature in a presidential system of governance, he can carry out his own independent agenda. Legislative and party supremacy over the governing body is not recognized in presidential governments. The president controls the party. He controls the members of the party through the distribution of special privileges in special cases, nomination of candidates in elections, appointment and dismissal of higher posts.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


3. In a presidential system of government, the president is the real head of state. As a result, he does not have to depend on the cabinet , legislature in any emergency or crisis situation. He can make his own decisions according to his own free will. The President can independently formulate various policies, make decisions and implement them. In all this he does not have to depend on the cabinet or the legislature.

4. Since the cabinet is only loyal to the president of the state in presidential governments - the cabinet in presidential governments cannot interfere with the work of the president in any way. Ministers hold office on the basis of their efficiency and the satisfaction of the President.

5. The president of a presidential government has to be directly dependent on the people. Therefore, the President refrains from formulating any anti-people policy. On the other hand, the ministers are also jointly responsible for the work of the President to the legislature and indirectly to the people. In this way, on the one hand, the arbitrariness of the President is stopped and on the other hand, under the pressure of public opinion, the vigilance and efficiency of the administrative department increases.

6. In a presidential system of governance, there is no basis for party majority, party support, etc. As a result, the President never has to be anxious to gain party support. As a result, the President can govern independently and without resorting to corruption. The party can in no way control the president here or the president does not feel the need to resort to any kind of party corruption.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


7. For a multi-party state, a presidential government is particularly effective. Because of the presence of so many political parties in multi-party states, it has been seen in many cases in the legislature that no party has been able to get an absolute majority. In most cases the legislature is seen to be triangular. Then the situation of the alliance is created and that alliance is formed on the basis of mutual interests, transactions and programs. Instead, presidential rule can be easily established above all these alliances. In a presidential government, the president is by no means dependent on a party majority. Therefore, in multi-party states, presidential rule is highly desirable.

8. The three branches of government - the administration, the legislature and the judiciary - cannot interfere in each other's affairs because of the principle of separation of powers in presidential states. As a result, the three departments can perform their functions independently and impartially, and the legislature can indirectly help to direct the administration in the right direction by highlighting the shortcomings of the administration.

9. In presidential regimes, ministers are directly appointed by the president. In this case, the President appoints those ministers whom he deems fit enough. In a parliamentary system of government, on the other hand, a person can become a minister only by a majority vote and the influence of the party. No one checks his qualifications for the ministry. Therefore, all the ministers appointed by the President's government perform their duties with great excellence and efficiency.

10. Presidential governments can make quicker decisions, take action on various issues, and so on. Parliamentary states, on the other hand, take a long time to reach a conclusion. But in states ruled by the President, since the President has the ultimate authority in the administration, the President alone can take any decision of the administration.

Disadvantages or Demerits of the Presidential Government . 

Errors or Inconveniences of the Presidential Government: -


1. In a system of government governed by the President, the President wields immense power. Therefore, there is a possibility for him to become a dictator very easily. Since the legislature has no control over the president, he can carry out his duties independently, and since his removal procedure is complicated, his removal is carried out through a very complex process. In other words, there is the possibility for the President to become dictatorial in the governments ruled by the President.

2. In a presidential government, the president is not directly accountable to the legislature. He is not obliged to be accountable in any matter in the legislature. In this case, the president is directly responsible to the electorate or the people. That is why many people refer to the government ruled by the President as an irresponsible government.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


3. The principle of separation of powers is recognized in presidential governments. As a result, the legislature, administration and the judiciary do not interfere in anyone's affairs, but conflicts between the functions of these three departments are extremely complex, jeopardizing the national interest and governing if there is no coordination between the two departments. 

4. Public opinion is not properly reflected in a presidential government. In a cabinet-run system of governance, ministers have to maintain a direct relationship with the will, aspirations, hopes and aspirations of the people. But this is not the case in a presidential government. The President can make his position known in a variety of ways; But it is not possible for him to communicate directly with the public.

5. In many cases, the President has resorted to nepotism, corruption, recruitment of acquaintances, etc., in the appointment of ministers, in the appointment of high-ranking officials. As a result, the right person does not get a place there. In such a scenario, if the President places more importance on loyalty and his own political interests than on the excellence of the system of governance - then that system of governance cannot be profitable.

6. The judiciary dominates presidential governments. Despite the recognition of the principle of separation of powers, the judiciary has the power to judge the legitimacy of the work of different departments. In accordance with the Constitution, the Judiciary exercises that power and seeks to extend or influence the Judiciary over the legislature and Administration.

7. The success of the government depends on the personal merits and demerits of the President. But if for some reason the president cannot run the government efficiently enough, the state will fail. As a result, the interests of the state are harmed. Again, the President cannot be removed without any specific allegation. As a result, the administration is facing failure.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments

What is the presidential system of governance? Discuss the features of the presidential system of government.

Definition and features of the presidential government . 




Presidential system of government : -


Presidential system of government refers to a system of government in which the governing body is governed independently by the powers conferred by the constitution, free from the influence of the legislature . In such a system, the governing body is not accountable to the legislature or the legislature cannot control the governing body and the existence of the governing body does not depend on the legislature. The principle of separation of powers is recognized in the system of government ruled by the President and accordingly the legislature  and Administration Department discharges its responsibilities completely independently.

The presidential system of government is basically a one-man government. The best example of a presidential government is the United States. In Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, etc there is also a presidential system of government .

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

Characteristics of Presidential government :- 

Features of Presidential government . 


1. Presence of the principle of separation of powers: - The principle of separation of powers is generally recognized in the President-ruled states. With the recognition of the principle of separation of powers, the legislature, the administration and the judiciary can operate in a completely separate, impartial and independent manner. In this national system, the legislature cannot control the governing body. Similarly, neither the president nor the administration is accountable to the legislature.

2. Actual Ruler: President: - In a system of government governed by the President, the President is considered to be the real ruler. The President is the mainstay of this system of governance. In a presidential system of government, the president is the head of state as well as the head of government. In this system of government, the President has the most power. Unlike the cabinet-run system of governance, it does not govern indirectly; He directly controls the administration and he is the omnipotent ruler of the administration.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

3. Responsibilities and Powers of the Cabinet: - As the responsibilities and duties of the Governing Body are increasing in every modern state, the Cabinet is also used to perform all the duties in the governments ruled by the President. But the cabinet of the presidential system of government is only the working class loyal to the president. They have no independence or power of their own. Performing the functions assigned by the President is the sole responsibility or power of the Cabinet and the tenure of the Cabinet depends on the support and satisfaction of the President. In a presidential system of government, cabinet members are not elected by the people. All of them are nominated by the President himself. The president can appoint and remove ministers as he wishes. Ministers are accountable only to the President. Ministers are not the President's colleagues in the presidential system; They are only loyal and subordinate employees appointed by the President.

4. Election and removal of the President: - In a presidential system of governance, the President is not indirectly elected by the legislature; He is directly appointed by the public. Therefore, the President is directly accountable to the people for his policies and functions. The president can only be removed on the basis of a few specific allegations. The President can be removed by adopting special procedures on the basis of treason, disrespect to the constitution, incompetence in running the state, etc.

5. The President is neutral to the legislative assembly: - In a system of governance governed by the President, the Legislative Assembly and President is neutral. The President does not have the power or role to take part in the election of the legislature or to dissolve the legislature and declare new elections, to make laws, etc. In a presidential system of government, the legislature enjoys the full power to make, change and repeal laws. Here the President has no right to interfere in any way.

6. No relationship between party majority in Presidential elections: - In the Presidential system of governance, party majority in Presidential elections is meaningless. In such a system the people directly elect the President. Presidential elections have nothing to do with the majority of certain parties in the legislature. It has been observed in the US Congress that the President is not from the party which has won the majority in the US Congress.

7. Lack of power of the President in matters of law: - In a state ruled by the President, the President has no role in making, changing and repealing laws. Since the President is not elected by the Legislature; Therefore, the President has no responsibility or power towards the legislature. In states governed by the President, the legislature enjoys exclusive rights in matters of law.

8. The President is accountable to the people: - In a President-ruled state, the President is directly elected by the people. So he is directly responsible to the people. In such a system, the legislature cannot control the president and the president is not accountable to the legislature.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments

What is the federal system ? Discuss the features of the federal system .




The concept and definition of the federal system :- 


In the context of the concept of federal governance, K.C. Wheare said the federal government  refers to the distribution of power between the central government and the state governments. According to the system of distribution of power, each government is independent and distinct in its own field.

A.V. Dicey said the federal system is a kind of political system in which the powers and rights of the states are combined with national unity and power.

In the federal system, power and authority are divided between the central and regional governments, Finer said.

Among the definitions given by political scientists, however, the one given by Birch is considered to be the best definition of the federal government. About the federal system of government, he said, the federal system of government is a system of government where power is divided between a general government or the central government and some regional governments in such a way that they complement each other and each of them governs the people through their representatives.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

Features of the federal system of government: -

Characteristics of the Federal Government: -


1. Presence of Central Government and State Government: - The existence of a Coalition Government can be mentioned here as the main feature of the Federal Government. Since there are two types of government in the federal system , this type of government is called a "dual system of government". On the one hand a general or central government is established at the center and on the other hand different state governments are formed for each state. The function of the central government is to establish national solidarity and unity and to play its role in fulfilling the national interest. On the other hand, the state governments are concerned about regional interests, demands, etc.

2. Central tendency: - Although there is a joint government system in the federal system, the central tendency is a significant feature of it. Since every state has a different diversity of culture, politics, language, etc., everyone has to depend on the center for the fulfillment of national interests and demands for defense. This created a centralized tendency in the federal system to protect national and regional interests, defense, international relations, and so on. In the federal system, both the central government and the state government are independent, but the central tendency of the state government is observed on various issues.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

3. Dominance of the Constitution: - Dominance of the Constitution is observed in the federal system. The supremacy of the constitution means that the constitution is the supreme law and the source of all power in that country. All powers are decentralized or distributed through the constitution. It is not possible for the central government, regional government or any other political body to violate the constitution. Everyone has to work under the constitution. The constitution also provides for the prevention of abuse of power by governments. Thus, in the federal system , the constitution is the main source of power and the supremacy of the constitution is unquestionable.

4. Decentralization of power: - Decentralization of power occurs in the federal system. Power is not confined to a single government like a unitary government but is devolved to different state governments and local autonomous bodies. As a result, there is an opportunity to increase administrative excellence through decentralization of power and more opportunities to meet the expectations of the people.

5. Preservation of regional distinctions: - Regional distinctions are preserved within the federal system . A federal government is usually established in countries with large populations. Large populations and large countries are generally diverse in terms of language, culture, economy, politics, etc., and regional governments can play their due role in meeting these diverse demands and interests. On the other hand, the central government can properly manage the issue of national unity and security. Thus, both regional and national interests and individual interests are protected .

6. Presence of written constitution: - The constitution is usually written in all the states where the federal system is prevalent. Because of the presence of different governments in such a system of governance, such as the central government, the state government, the local autonomous bodies, etc., the presence of different government authorities necessitates a written constitution. It is possible to implement through a written constitution instructions to play an appropriate role through a specific distribution of power. Therefore, the Constitution of the federal government is generally written and power is divided between the Central and State Governments and various institutions through the Constitution.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

7. Difficult to change the constitution: - The federal constitution is usually difficult to change. Since the sole power of the central government is not recognized here - here the central and state governments run the state jointly. So the federal constitution is immutable. So that no government can change the constitution as they wish. The constitution has to be changed with the consent of both types of government.

8. Dual citizenship: - Dual citizenship is observed in the federal system. Dual citizenship is - on the one hand the person is a citizen of the nation and on the other hand the person is a citizen of the state. Dual citizenship is recognized in almost every federal system. That is, the person is a citizen of the nation on the one hand and a citizen of the state in which he resides on the other. However, it should be noted that although the federal system is recognized in India, dual citizenship is not recognized here.

9. Bicameral legislature: - Under federal rule, the legislature is usually bicameral. These two houses are the lower house and the upper house. In the lower house the directly elected representatives get seats and in the upper house the representative members get the opportunity. These two chambers play an important role in the enactment of laws and the role of both the State Legislature and the Central Legislative Assembly in enacting laws on different issues is important here.

10. Federal Courts: - The existence of federal courts in the federal system is obvious. It can be said that it is not possible to have a federal system of government without a federal court system. Because, since different types of government exist here, it is very normal for different governments to start opposing on different issues. The judiciary acts as an impartial authority to resolve disputes between one or more state governments, the central government and the state government. Federal courts can also judge the validity of various laws, orders, etc. issued by the legislature. The federal court also has an important role to play in interpreting the constitution.

11. Individual Revenue System: - In the federal system of government, the revenue system is usually separate. Here both governments are quite financially compatible. Because it is not possible for any central or state government to run the government if it is not financially sound enough. That is why every government has its own revenue system.

12. Individual Constitution: - The existence of a separate constitution can be mentioned in the conventional federal system. For example, different states in the United States have different and distinct constitutions. However, every constitution of the state has to be in line with the national constitution. However, it is important to note that although the federal system is recognized in India, there is no recognition or existence of separate constitutions for the states. 

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments

Advantages and disadvantages of the federal government.

Merit and demerits of the federal government.




Benefits or merits of the Federal Government: -

  
1. Coordination of national and regional interests: - It is possible for the federal government to coordinate national unity and interests with regional independence and interest. Fulfilling national interests through a strong central government and fulfilling regional interests through provincial governments and addressing local issues through local autonomous bodies - etc. result in reconciliation between national unity and regional and local interests.

2. Advantages of the policy of decentralization of power: - The decentralization of power in the federal system has resulted in the division of power between the governments of the various states and the local autonomous bodies, not just under one government. As a result, it is possible to build effective governance in all areas and to solve various problems appropriately.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

3. Protecting regional independence and interests : - Federal governments play an important role in protecting regional independence and interests. Due to the decentralization of power to the federal government, regional governments enjoy considerable independence and power through their constitutional powers. As a result, the provincial governments can discharge their responsibilities and duties independently in the protection of regional independence and interests.

4. Control over the authority of the bureaucracy: - In the federal system, the bureaucracy is under the direct control of the administrative department. As a result, it is not possible for the bureaucracy to establish authority over the entire system of governance. In the federal system of government, a parallel system of government with the people's representatives developed along with the bureaucracy. As a result, it is possible to solve the problems and grievances of the people through the people's representatives.

5. Development of political consciousness: - The federal government is always helpful in developing political consciousness. In the federal system, common people can participate directly in government and administration. As a result, the political consciousness of the people increased. The massive involvement of the common man in the regional autonomous bodies raises the level of their political consciousness.

6. Increase in administrative excellence: - Administrative excellence is seen to increase in the federal system. The central government on the one hand and the state government and local autonomous bodies on the other - each has different responsibilities and duties assigned or listed in the constitution. In order to fulfill all these responsibilities and duties, every part of the federal government, namely the central, state and local self-governing bodies, has to fulfill its responsibilities properly. Since their responsibilities and duties are listed in the constitution, the question of avoiding duties does not exist. As a result, their efficiency and excellence in administrative matters increased.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

7. Establishing unity in diversity: - In this case, the federal government achieves unity in diversity. The federal system is more common in countries with large populations. A country with a large and huge population can be seen in all aspects of politics, economy, culture, etc. The federal government has been instrumental in uniting all these differences.

8. Prevention of dictatorship: - The federal system is able to prevent dictatorial behavior in the administrative field. Since the decentralization of power is recognized in the federal system, the central, state, and local autonomous bodies all enjoy constitutional powers. So there is very little chance of any government or governing body being dictatorial. In the federal system, every government is forced to refrain from abusing its power to increase its powers as it sees fit. Even if the central government or any other government adopts dictatorship, the court can take action against it.

9. Excellence and Democracy in Legislation: - Some special features can be observed in the federal system of legislation. In federal governments, the legislature has the upper hand in law-making. But this power is not limited to the central government legislature. The power to make laws is also vested in the hands of the state legislatures. The benefits of various types of experiments, research, etc. can be enjoyed with any law.

10. Suitable for a large state: - In a large state, of course, the federal government is desirable. Because if all the powers of a large state are in the hands of a single unitary government, it will not be able to manage the governance system of a large state efficiently. There are also variations in the population, culture, politics, etc. of a large state. Unitary government alone is not able to govern efficiently in this diverse environment. So the federal government is certainly desirable in the large states.

Demerits or disadvantages of the federal government. 


1. Weaknesses in the system of governance: - Since the decentralization of power is recognized in the federal system of government, the federal governments are considered to be weaker than the unitary government. In this system, the central government does not have all the power - it is divided between the various states and local autonomous bodies. In the federal system, conflicts between the center-state, one state with multiple states, and local autonomous bodies are often observed. As a result, federal governments are weaker than unitary governments.

2. Complexity in the implementation of international policy: - The central government is not able to formulate policies in the international interest without the support of the states. As the federal system prevails in a large state, different states operate administrative systems based on different programs and ideologies. It is difficult to reconcile these different principles and ideology. So there are complications in the administrative field. If the central norms and programs are not coordinated with the norms and programs of the states, it has a profound effect on the formulation of international policy.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

3. Possibility of Center-State Dispute: - In the federal system, the division of power by the Constitution creates the possibility of easy conflict between the Center and the States. Disagreements between the center and the states endanger the interests of the states and in many cases the center is dependent on the states. As a result, the interests of the Center are also endangered in the Center-State disagreement.

4. Not suitable for variability: - In the federal system, the constitution is quite unchangeable. Therefore, it is not possible to change the constitution quickly with the changes in various fields like administrative, political, socio-cultural etc. The inconsistency of the constitution complicates the federal system. Different parties are in power in the central and state governments, which easily leads to disagreements between them. This disagreement hinders the fulfillment and progress of the interests of the state and the nation.

5. Dominance of the court: - In the federal system, the constitution and the supremacy of the court are found. The only source of all power is the constitution. Therefore, the court can judge the validity of various directives made by the legislature and the administration .The court may, if it so desires, declare any law or instruction invalid. This created complications in the administrative field.

6. Not suitable for crisis situations: - Federal measures are not desirable in any emergency or crisis situation. Quick decisions need to be made in any emergency or crisis situation. But the distribution of power in the federal system makes it impossible to make quick decisions and take urgent action in most cases. Therefore, the federal system is not compatible with emergency situations.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

7. More power in the hands of the center: - In the federal system, power is vested in the central and state governments by the constitution, but most of the power is vested in the central government. The central government has more rights and powers than the state government. So the state governments are forced to depend on the center. This dependence hinders the pace of development of the state and in many cases causes central and state conflicts.

8. Contributes to the emergence of provincialism: - Narrowness, provincialism, separatism, etc. can easily develop in the federal system. If the central government has been indifferent to a particular state or region for a long time, or if the specific demands of that state or region are not met for a long time, then regionalism, provincialism, etc. will easily emerge in the federal system.

9. Administrative slowness: - The federal system is slower than the unitary system. Negotiations in different cases initiate disputes between the Center and the States in different ways while making decisions. As a result, such issues slow down the federal system.

10. Expensive: - The federal system is very expensive. Central governments on the one hand and different state governments for each state on the other, as well as local autonomous bodies - all these institutions cost a lot more than a unitary system of governance. Also a huge amount of money is spent on the election .

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )


Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a unitary government.

Merits and Demerits of the Unitary Government. 




Advantages and benefits of a unitary government: -


1. The possibility of less administrative complexity : - Since in unitary states all the powers of the state are vested in a single government, it is possible to easily enforce the same kind of laws and regulations in the whole country in administrative matters. Therefore, complications are less likely to arise in the management of the administrative system.

2. Absence of inequality in the states: - In a unitary system of governance, all the powers are vested in the central government only, so the same policy is applied in the whole country. As a result, in the case of states, it is impossible to make any allegations of discrimination against the central government.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

3. Support for National Solidarity: - In a unitary system, the same type of law and order prevails in the whole country. Citizens are loyal only to the central government. As a result of the same policy prevailing all over the country, provincialism, separatism, etc. cannot be raised. Therefore, the unitary government plays a supportive role for national unity.

4. More suitable for small states: - In the administrative system of small states, the unitary system of government is more effective and suitable than the federal system. In general, small states have very little diversity of race, caste, language, culture, etc., compared to large states. As a result, unitary governance is more appropriate in all these states.

5. Advantages of law making: - In the system of unitary governance, the central legislature prevails instead of the constitution. The Central Legislature can formulate and amend laws according to its own wishes and needs. The judiciary does not have the power to interpret or repeal laws here. Therefore, legislation and amendment in a unitary system of governance is much easier than in the federal system.

6. Advantages in the international diplomatic system: - In a unitary state, all the powers of the state are vested in a single government, so there are many advantages in the execution of international treaties etc. It is not possible to impose any barriers on the states to implement these agreements. The central government participates in international politics according to its own needs, policies and facilities and can easily execute treaties.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

7. Advantages in the economic field: - The central government can also play an effective role in the implementation of various economic plans. Different economic policies for the whole state and its implementation, economic planning for the states and the power to formulate it in the hands of only one government or central government .So there is no possibility of economic conflict between the center and the states. As a result, the economic policy adopted by the central government can be easily formulated.

8. It is not possible for the judiciary to obstruct the work of the law and administration department: - The judiciary has no predominance in unitary governments. As a result, the judiciary cannot interfere in the formulation of various laws, administrative aspects and policy formulation and its implementation in the functions of a unitary government. As a result, policy adoption and implementation takes place in a faster and easier way.

9. Low-cost: - Professor Garner spoke of the low-cost completion of a unitary state. In a unitary state only one government governs the whole country. As a result, administrative and legal costs are much lower than in the federal states. 

10. Helpful for emergencies: - The state often has to face emergencies like war, mass uprising, economic stagnation, separatism, terrorism etc. This situation necessitates quick decision making and action. The unitary government is much more effective than the federal government in controlling these situations.

Disadvantages or demerits of a unitary government: -


1. Since all the powers of the unitary government are vested in a single government, only the central government is established; Regional governments do not matter. Regional governments only become obedient slaves of the central government. This system is not conducive to local autonomy and democracy. In unitary states, large national issues prevail over local ones. As a result local problems and needs are always neglected.

2. In a unitary state, all legislative powers are vested in the Central Legislature and in this case only the Central Legislature has the upper hand. But different needs of a country are different and different in different aspects like economic, political, social, cultural etc. In this diverse environment, legislation only centrally is less likely to be effective for the country as a whole.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

3. Urgent action is required in case of emergency or crisis. If for some reason the central government cannot prevent or control that crisis then a special problem arises. So a unitary government is effective for emergencies - but it is not so.

4. In a unitary state system, it is not possible to pay attention to the various regional demands and regional problems. As a result, regionalism, provincialism, separatism, etc. prevailed in different regions or provinces. Added to this ,  the anti-central attitude can arouse. .

5. A unitary government is by no means suitable for a large state. The size and population of a large state cannot be managed by a single central government properly.  That is why a unitary government is never effective in a large state.

6. Economically, a unitary government is not desirable. Because different parts of a state may have different types of economic problems. It is not possible for the central government alone to formulate economic policy considering all the economic advantages and disadvantages of all parts of the state. This created a favorable environment for the economic stagnation of the state.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

7. Since the unitary government is flexible, the ruling party in the unitary government can amend the constitution at its own convenience and in its own interest. As a result, there is a possibility of increasing dictatorship and party arbitrariness and the state moves towards dictatorship.

8. A unitary government can never encourage the masses in political consciousness and activity. Political life is limited to a unitary state. Public participation is low there. As a result, there is a special lack of public participation in political consciousness and administration.

9. Unitary governments are completely bureaucratic. As a result, bureaucratic complexity, procrastination, etc., have a negative effect on the administration, and as the power of bureaucrats increases, the system of governance becomes bureaucratic, and local problems, such as public grievances, cannot be fully resolved.

10. It is alleged that the unitary system of governance is,  in many cases, undemocratic. Because the only source of power here is the central government. The central government runs the state according to its own wishes and interests. Regional governments or other parties have no independent entity or existence. Decentralization of power is not possible here and public participation in administration is not possible. As a result, a unitary government cannot be called democratic in any way.

LIST OF ALL NOTES/PROJECTS ( CLICK HERE )

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

About me

Hellow viewers, myself Nandan Dutta reside at Maheshpur ,Malda, West Bengal, India.

My intent to make the website is to share my view and knowledge to the HS students. They can easily find projects, HS suggestion and many more here.


Categories

  • Career (2)
  • CLASS 11 (XI) (1)
  • Class XI 1st Semester (7)
  • CLASS XI 2nd Semester (16)
  • H.S. 3rd SEM (9)
  • H.S. EDUCATION (5)
  • H.S. HISTORY (1)
  • HS SOCIOLOGY (2)
  • HS SUGGESTION (1)
  • INDIAN HISTORY (30)
  • NCERT (1)
  • POLITY (61)
  • PROJECT (96)
  • Sociological Studies (79)
  • Teaching & Education (128)
  • TEST PAPERS SOLVE (11)
  • TEST PAPERS SOLVE 2020 (7)
  • WORLD HISTORY (53)
  • XI EDUCATION (7)
  • XI HISTORY (3)
  • XI POL SC (1)
  • XI SOCIOLOGY (1)
  • XII Bengali (1)
  • XII Sanskrit (1)

recent posts

Sponsor

Facebook

Blog Archive

  • July 2025 (14)
  • June 2025 (4)
  • May 2025 (23)
  • April 2025 (75)
  • March 2025 (32)
  • December 2024 (5)
  • November 2024 (70)
  • October 2024 (1)
  • September 2024 (1)
  • July 2024 (5)
  • June 2024 (3)
  • April 2024 (2)
  • March 2024 (3)
  • February 2024 (11)
  • January 2024 (1)
  • November 2023 (4)
  • October 2023 (8)
  • September 2023 (10)
  • April 2023 (9)
  • March 2023 (18)
  • February 2023 (2)
  • January 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (3)
  • November 2022 (3)
  • October 2022 (4)
  • September 2022 (16)
  • August 2022 (3)
  • July 2022 (5)
  • June 2022 (5)
  • April 2022 (23)
  • March 2022 (10)
  • February 2022 (18)
  • January 2022 (30)
  • December 2021 (8)
  • November 2021 (12)
  • October 2021 (2)
  • September 2021 (5)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • June 2021 (5)
  • May 2021 (1)
  • April 2021 (2)
  • November 2020 (1)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (3)
  • May 2020 (1)
  • October 2019 (3)
  • September 2019 (5)
  • August 2019 (3)
  • June 2019 (3)
  • May 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (3)
  • October 2018 (4)
  • August 2018 (1)

Total Pageviews

Report Abuse

About Me

subhankar dutta
View my complete profile

Sponsor

Pages

  • Home
  • Project
  • জাতীà§Ÿ শিক্ষানীতি 1986 SAQ
  • EDU FINAL A 2020
  • Class XI ( Class 11 ) Sociology chapter wise MCQ &...
  • Class 12 (H.S.) History Chapter Wise MCQ & SAQ
  • Class 11 (XI) Sociology 1st chapter MCQ & SAQ
  • H.S. Sociology notes .
  • H.S. Sociology 1st chapter MCQ & SAQ ( only reduce...
  • H.S. Education 10th chapter SAQ & MCQ
  • H.S. Education 10th chapter MCQ & SAQ
  • CLASS 12 SOCIOLOGY 4TH CHAPTER SAQ WITH ANSWER

Pages

  • About Me
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Created with by ThemeXpose | Distributed by Blogger Templates